A motion to have the matters specified in requests for admission deemed admitted in California is the topic of this blog post.
A motion to have the matters specified in requests for admission deemed admitted in California is also known as an order establishing the truth of each matter specified in the requests for admissions that were served on the other party.
The matters specified may be the truth of certain facts, or the genuineness of certain documents.
Requests for admissions are very useful in that they allow a party to get certain admissions or denials of issues relevant to the lawsuit on record before the trial, as well as authenticating certain documents.
If you can get an order establishing the truth of each matter specified in the requests for admissions that will greatly increase your chances of prevailing at trial.
Law authorizing requests for admission deemed admitted in California.
Under Code of Civil Procedure Section 2033.280(b), if a party to whom requests for admission are directed fails to serve a response, the propounding party may move the court for an order establishing the truth of each matter specified in the requests for admission. Section 2033.280 contains no time limit for a motion to compel where no responses have been served.
And it is mandatory that the Court grant the order unless code compliant responses are served before the hearing on the motion.
The court shall make this order unless it finds that the party to whom the request for admissions was served, before the hearing on the motion, served a proposed response to the Request for Admissions that is in substantial compliance with section 2033.220 See Code of Civil Procedure § 2033.280(b).
No informal “meet-and confer” requirement attaches before a party may bring a motion for an order establishing admissions. Demyer v. Costa Mesa Mobile Home Estates (1995) 36 Cal.App.4th 393, 395.
Additionally, there is no time limit on bringing motions to have matters deemed admitted. Brigante v. Huang (1993) 20 Cal.App.4th 1569, 1584.
Failure of the responding party to serve the requested responses in “substantial compliance” with the code prior to the hearing on a motion makes it mandatory that the court grant the admissions motion, Demyer, Supra, at pp. 395-396.
No separate statement is required when no response has been provided to the discovery. California Rule of Court 3.1345(b).
It is mandatory that the court impose a monetary sanction under § 2023 on the party or attorney, or both, whose failure to serve a timely response to request for admissions necessitated an application for an order establishing admissions. Appleton v. Superior Court (1988) 206 Cal.App.3d 632, 634.
Sample motion to have the matters specified in requests for admission deemed admitted in California for sale.
Attorneys or parties in the State of California who wish to view a sample motion for an order having matters deemed admitted can see below.
The author of this blog post, Stan Burman, is an entrepreneur and freelance paralegal who has worked in California and Federal litigation since 1995 and has created over 300 sample legal documents for California and Federal litigation. Mr. Burman offers legal research and document preparation assistance with any California or Federal litigation matters for attorneys and law firms on a freelance basis. Mr. Burman may be contacted by e-mail at DivParalgl@yahoo.com for more information. He accepts payments through PayPal which means that you can pay using most credit or debit cards.
You can view portions of over 300 sample legal documents for California and Federal litigation at View over 300 sample legal documents for sale
*Do you want to use this article on your website, blog or e-zine? You can, as long as you include this blurb with it: “Stan Burman is the author of over 300 sample legal documents for California and Federal litigation and is the author of a free weekly legal newsletter. You can receive 10 free gifts just for subscribing. Just visit http://freeweeklylegalnewsletter.gr8.com/ for more information.”
Follow the author on Twitter at: https://twitter.com/LegalDocsPro
Please note that the author of this blog post, Stan Burman is NOT an attorney and as such is unable to provide any specific legal advice. The author is NOT engaged in providing any legal, financial, or other professional services, and any information contained in this blog post is NOT intended to constitute legal advice.
The materials and information contained in this blog post have been prepared by Stan Burman for informational purposes only and are not legal advice. Transmission of the information contained in this blog post is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute, any business relationship between the author and any readers. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.